Hmmm, tough one this….
Not sure why the recent proliferations of designer collaborations (ew what an awful sentence). Broadening the market in tough economic times? Getting a slice of the enormous growth of the high street?
Diffusion lines are common. Marc Jacobs has Marc by Marc Jacobs, Chloe has See by Chloe – both much cheaper than the main line. But lately designer collaborations in my opinion have diluted the market – H and M has had Karl Lagerfeld, Versace, Matthew Williamson, Jimmy Choo, Victor and Rolf, Stella McCartney Marni among others. Some of the items were good, others were awful. Quality varied enormously. Other chains have followed suit – New Look, Topshop you name it. But now that so many have entered the market, is it such a good idea anymore? Madonna sportswear and David Beckham undercrackers for H and M just don’t appeal. It feels a bit like Gucci in the 1980s when they put their name on everything and the overfranchising diluted the brand value completely. Celebrity perfumes are another thing entirely – not my thing but Elizabeth Taylor White Diamonds and Sarah Jessica Parker Lovely have been best sellers. And Justin Bieber’s name sells 1 bottle of ‘Girlfriend’ a minute. Though that’s another issue entirely.
One of my most treasured posessions is a Mulberry Luella Giselle handbag (pictured above and below). Only done for a season – Luella couldn’t afford to produce bags so Mulberry did it for her. The bag was such a success that Luella became a brand of its own. Luella as a brand has closed down now but my Mulberry Luella is a thing of beauty. The quality and workmanship is absolutely fantastic and she understood the Mulberry market – the size, style, quality and workmanship fits 100% into the Mulberry brand. I have been offered a fortune for my one but will never ever part with it.
I can even understand Jonathan Saunders collaborating with Smythsons – his colour blocking works well on their designs and is true Jonathan Saunders. And of course Louis Vuitton has many collaborations. The most sought after are the Stephen Sprouse Graffiti bags.
But Alice Temperley for Filofax? Um, nope doesn’t work for me. On so many levels. The workmanship on the guts of the filofax (the rings) is shoddy. The designs are way overpriced. And the inserts (which are the most important thing in my opinion) are nothing special apart from designery flourishes here and there on the stationery. Last seasons Affair went for almost £400 and as far as I know you cannot get new inserts when your Temperley ones are done. This season’s ones are cheaper but they just don’t say Alice Temperley to me. They just scream ‘a designer needs a new market and has put her name on something’. The similarity of the new Temperley Violet to the Aspinal Purple Croc is actually shocking.
Sorry Filofax you need to do better. How about a collaboration with someone in the – here’s a an idea – planner market! Moleskine? Covey? Apple? Google Calendar? Even though they are competitors I am sure there is something to be gained by a small overlap as people usually combine one or two of them anyway.
Or, best of all, Filofax let the community at Philofaxy design a planner and inserts for you as part of a competition where the best three go into limited production. Now that I would pay good money for!
